60 / Federal / 2021 on 2021-06-21 If a conflict of venue jurisdiction occurs between the federal judiciary and the judicial bodies of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, the investigative judge in the federal courts or the investigative judge in the region may not return the investigative papers to the court from which they were referred if he sees that he is not competent to investigate, but rather he must submit the matter to the Federal Supreme Court to determine the court with jurisdiction over the investigation based on the provisions of Article (93/8th/A) of the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq for the year 2005.
61 / Federal / 2021 on 2021-06-21 If a conflict of venue jurisdiction occurs between the federal judiciary and the judicial bodies of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, the investigative judge in the federal courts or the investigative judge in the region may not return the investigative papers to the court from which they were referred if he sees that he is not competent to investigate, but rather he must submit the matter to the Federal Supreme Court to determine the court with jurisdiction over the investigation based on the provisions of Article (93/8th/A) of the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq for the year 2005.
48 / Federal / 2021 on 2021-06-06 The Federal Supreme Court is competent to interpret laws in two cases: First: On the occasion of a litigation, filed before it to decide on the constitutionality of the law that is the subject of interpretation. Second: If the request for interpretation is received from the three authorities (legislative authorities represented by the Council of Representatives and the Federation Council, the executive authority represented by the Presidency of the Republic and the Prime Minister, the Supreme Judicial Council) in addition to the prime minister of the region. Provided that the text that is the subject of interpretation is subject of application in existing disputes before the ordinary or administrative judiciary, and that the request for interpretation is signed by the head of the authority or the prime minister of the region exclusively.
59/federal/2021 on 2021-06-21 If a conflict of venue jurisdiction occurs between the federal judiciary and the judicial bodies of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, the investigative judge in the federal courts or the investigative judge in the region may not return the investigative papers to the court from which they were referred if he sees that he is not competent to investigate, but rather he must submit the matter to the Federal Supreme Court to determine the court with jurisdiction over the investigation based on the provisions of Article (93/8th/A) of the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq for the year 2005.
41 / Federal / 2021 on 2021-06-15 A- (The legislator’s goal in legislating Paragraph (Third) of Article 32 of the amended Execution Law No. 45 of 1980 is to find a new mechanism within the means of forced execution through which the financially able debtor who is procrastinating is forced to implement, and not leave the opportunity before him to prolong the period of repayment of the debt or to smuggle its money). B - (What was stated in Paragraph (Third) of Article 32 of the Amended Implementation Law No. 45 of 1980 does not conflict with the principles and provisions of Islam stipulated in Article (2/1st/A) of the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq for the year 2005, as it does not conflict with the rights and freedoms stipulated therein that are guaranteed to all). C- (What was stated in Paragraph (Third) of Article (32) of the Execution Law No. (45) of 1980 as amended, is an effective means to preserve public money by notifying those who have been owed a debt to the state for any reason whatsoever, that they can be imprisoned for a period not specified until a guarantor is presented, as a guarantee for the payment of those debts). D- (The necessity for the implementation directorates to take into account what was stated in Article (15/Third) of Law No. (13) of 2019 the Sixth Amendment Law to the Execution Law No. 45 of 1980 as amended, and that state departments and the public sector in order to preserve public money are obligated to follow All legal means necessary to collect state debts owed by natural and legal persons for any reason, and among those ways is what is included in Article (32) of the Execution Law and all its paragraphs, especially that Article (1) of the Government Debt Collection Law specifies the debts covered by its provisions)
27 / Federal / 2021 on 2021-05-02 The Federal Supreme Court sees that the investigative judge’s actions and decisions are not invalid for being issued in violation of the provisions of Paragraph (alif) of Article (53) of the Criminal Procedure law No. (23) of 1971, as amended, based on the contents of Paragraph (C) of the same article, and that the passage of a long period since the investigation with the accused was conducted by the aforementioned investigative court and its reaching advanced stages makes it (the investigation court) the competent to conduct the investigation in place.
